**** UPDATE 15 August 2018 ****
DDJ Civil test report: here – very useful especially for part 3 test.
**** UPDATE 11 July 2018****
Do read this : 1st Tier Tribunal qualifying test report – it will give candidates sitting QTs invaluable insights and how these tests work and are scored.
***** UPDATE 24 June 2018 *****
The Employment Judge competition will have a 3 part test on 17 July following a similar format as explained below. Although I expect that the situational judgment test will be more focused on Employment Tribunal scenarios. The Recorder 2018 test will, I think, have the first two parts on the 19 July and those passing these will be invited to sit the narrative scenario test on 11 September.
What could possibly go wrong?!
***** UPDATE 23 April 2018 *****
JAC server problems and seems like a repeat of the Recorder shambles last year. Candidates being advised to try again and test window extended until 11pm this evening (17/04). If you have hit problems, make a note of the issues and e-mail [email protected] – they will surely have to make allowances for candidates effected. Some candidates may see it as a free dry run and have gained an advantage, others have been left totally frustrated and have now lost their opportunity to take the test.
Because of last week’s technical problems some candidates are being invited to re-sit DDJ tests on either 24/04 or 26/04 > raises more questions than answers?!
***** UPDATE 22 February 2018 *****
Following the Recorder competition debacle, the JAC believe they have now fully resolved their technical issues. They will be using one test with three elements to shortlist candidates in the First Tier (06/03) and DDJ (17/04) competitions:
“The test is 2 hours long and is divided into three parts:
- Part 1: 40 minute multiple choice test with 31 questions (testing Situational Judgement)
- Part 2: 40 minute multiple choice test with 18 questions (testing Critical Analysis)
- Part 3: 40 minute scenario-based test requiring 2 written answers.”
Hurdles 1 & 2 Below
**** My Mock On-line Multiple Choice Tests Available here ****
The JAC accepts that short-listing via qualifying tests is sub-optimal, but given the number of applicants in some competitions, it has become their default position. Whether the pass mark is relatively low or high is immaterial; there is a very fine line between success and failure and many candidates, who would make great judges, don’t even make it to the selections days. The qualifying tests are a brilliant way of identifying people who are good at doing qualifying tests but not necessarily the best judges. I’ve argued before that a lottery would produce a similar pool of candidates as multiple-choice tests. However, these tests are here to stay and will continue to evolve – so how should you approach them?